"[L]abour union lobbies and their political friends have decided that the ideal defence against competition from the poor countries is to raise their cost of production by forcing their standards up, claiming that competition with countries with lower standards is “unfair”. “Free but fair trade” becomes an exercise in insidious protectionism that few recognise as such."
Jagdish Bhagwati,
"Obama and Trade: An Alarm Sounds," Financial Times. January 9, 2009.

August 5, 2003
Trade Policy Analysis no. 24
by Brink Lindsey
Brink Lindsey is director of the Cato Institute's Center for Trade Policy Studies.
In May 2003 President Bush announced plans to create a U.S.-Middle East free-trade area within a decade. The new trade initiative aims to combat terrorism, and the Islamist extremism that underlies it, by promoting economic and political development in the Muslim world. The administration moved quickly to begin putting its plans into action by announcing that the United States and Bahrain would soon commence negotiations for a free-trade agreement (FTA). Meanwhile, negotiations for an FTA with Morocco are already under way, and a U.S.-Jordan FTA, now in its second year, has produced a boom in Jordanian exports.
The Bush administration should be congratulated for opening a trade front in the war on terrorism. With the proper commitment and follow-through, a major U.S. trade initiative in the Muslim world can give real encouragement to desperately needed growth and reform in that troubled region.
The fact is, though, that negotiating FTAs will take time. Relatively few countries in the region are ready to begin serious talks. Hammering out all the details of a mutually acceptable agreement with those that are prepared to take the plunge-and then guiding that agreement through approval by Congress-will be a complex, contentious, and time-consuming process. A U.S.-Middle East free-trade area, however desirable, is a policy goal for the long term. Meanwhile, the administration's initiative fails to include Turkey, Afghanistan, or Pakistan-all countries with obvious geopolitical significance.
Accordingly, the Bush administration should supplement its pursuit of FTAs with an initiative that is simultaneously broader in scope and capable of generating immediate results. Specifically, the administration should endorse and actively support legislation to grant temporary duty-free, quota-free access to the U.S. market for exports of selected Muslim countries. The unilateral elimination of U.S. trade barriers would give tangible, dramatic proof of U.S. commitment to the region, thereby providing a jump-start for the longer, arduous process of negotiating FTAs.
Unions As Safe in Colombia As in D.C.
CEObama
Automakers That Can't Compete Deserve to Disappear
The European Union Stops Banning Ugly Veggies
by Doug Bandow
July 1, 2009
Attention GM Shareholders (That Means You!)
by Daniel Ikenson
June 30, 2009
Charles Rangel Keeps a Cool Head
by Sallie James
June 25, 2009