Hot Topics

Noteworthy

"The simple fact is that highly skilled foreign-born workers make enormous contributions to our economy [...] The US will find it far more difficult to maintain its competitive edge over the next 50 years if it excludes those who are able and willing to help us compete. Other nations are benefiting from our misguided policies."
Bill Gates,
Testimony before the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives,
March 12, 2008.

February 9, 2001

Trade Policy Analysis no. 12

America's Record Trade Deficit: A Symbol of Economic Strength

by Daniel T. Griswold

Daniel Griswold is the associate director of the Cato Institute's Center for Trade Policy Studies

Executive Summary

America's chronic trade deficit continues to set new records, both for its sheer size in nominal terms and for its share of an expanding gross national product. The record deficit is fueling worry that it could hurt U.S. industry, destroy jobs, burden future generations, and cause the current economic expansion to end in a "hard landing." But those worries rest on a fundamental misunderstanding of the causes and consequences of the U.S. trade deficit.

In November 2000 the congressionally appointed Trade Deficit Review Commission issued its final report, The U.S. Trade Deficit: Causes, Consequences and Recommendations for Action. The report reflected the views of a sharply divided commission, with Democratic appointed members warning of the dangers of the deficit while Republican appointed members emphasized its more benign nature.

Economic theory and experience demonstrate that trade deficits are driven primarily by macroeconomic factors, in particular investment flows, and not by allegedly unfair trade barriers or declining industrial competitiveness.

Because of the link between trade deficits and rising investment, larger trade deficits are typically accompanied by improving economic conditions. A survey of the U.S. economy since 1973 confirms that, by almost any measure--economic growth, employment, industrial production, poverty reduction--the economy has performed better in years in which the trade deficit rose than in years in which it shrank.

America's annual trade deficits are sustainable as long as the United States remains a safe and profitable destination for the world's savings. The accumulating net foreign ownership of U.S. assets, America's socalled foreign debt, does not threaten our sovereignty, our ability to finance that investment, or continued economic expansion.

The best policy response for the new administration and Congress would be to ignore the U.S. trade deficit as a target of policy and concentrate instead on maintaining a strong and open domestic economy that welcomes foreign investment.


Text of Trade Policy Analysis No. 12 (PDF, 20pgs, 351k)



Commentary

Immigration law should reflect our dynamic labor market
by Daniel Griswold
April 27, 2008

America will be poorer as Obama pursues the wealthier
by Sallie James
April 23, 2008

When employment lines cross borders
by Daniel Griswold
April 21, 2008

Dems betray our ally Colombia
by Daniel Griswold
April 18, 2008

View all

CTPS @ Liberty

A Promising Farm Bill Development
by Sallie James
May 8, 2008

No Way to Treat the Customers
by Daniel Ikenson
May 6, 2008

Ag Committee Chair Demands Higher Food Prices
by Daniel Griswold
May 5, 2008

AZ-Verify
by Jim Harper
May 1, 2008

View all