Hot Topics

Noteworthy

"The simple fact is that highly skilled foreign-born workers make enormous contributions to our economy [...] The US will find it far more difficult to maintain its competitive edge over the next 50 years if it excludes those who are able and willing to help us compete. Other nations are benefiting from our misguided policies."
Bill Gates,
Testimony before the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives,
March 12, 2008.

August 5, 2003

Trade Policy Analysis no. 24

The Trade Front: Combating Terrorism with Open Markets

by Brink Lindsey

Brink Lindsey is director of the Cato Institute's Center for Trade Policy Studies.

Executive Summary

In May 2003 President Bush announced plans to create a U.S.-Middle East free-trade area within a decade. The new trade initiative aims to combat terrorism, and the Islamist extremism that underlies it, by promoting economic and political development in the Muslim world. The administration moved quickly to begin putting its plans into action by announcing that the United States and Bahrain would soon commence negotiations for a free-trade agreement (FTA). Meanwhile, negotiations for an FTA with Morocco are already under way, and a U.S.-Jordan FTA, now in its second year, has produced a boom in Jordanian exports.

The Bush administration should be congratulated for opening a trade front in the war on terrorism. With the proper commitment and follow-through, a major U.S. trade initiative in the Muslim world can give real encouragement to desperately needed growth and reform in that troubled region.

The fact is, though, that negotiating FTAs will take time. Relatively few countries in the region are ready to begin serious talks. Hammering out all the details of a mutually acceptable agreement with those that are prepared to take the plunge-and then guiding that agreement through approval by Congress-will be a complex, contentious, and time-consuming process. A U.S.-Middle East free-trade area, however desirable, is a policy goal for the long term. Meanwhile, the administration's initiative fails to include Turkey, Afghanistan, or Pakistan-all countries with obvious geopolitical significance.

Accordingly, the Bush administration should supplement its pursuit of FTAs with an initiative that is simultaneously broader in scope and capable of generating immediate results. Specifically, the administration should endorse and actively support legislation to grant temporary duty-free, quota-free access to the U.S. market for exports of selected Muslim countries. The unilateral elimination of U.S. trade barriers would give tangible, dramatic proof of U.S. commitment to the region, thereby providing a jump-start for the longer, arduous process of negotiating FTAs.

 


Text of Trade Policy Analysis No. 24 (PDF, 16pgs, 242k)



Commentary

Immigration law should reflect our dynamic labor market
by Daniel Griswold
April 27, 2008

America will be poorer as Obama pursues the wealthier
by Sallie James
April 23, 2008

When employment lines cross borders
by Daniel Griswold
April 21, 2008

Dems betray our ally Colombia
by Daniel Griswold
April 18, 2008

View all

CTPS @ Liberty