"[L]abour union lobbies and their political friends have decided that the ideal defence against competition from the poor countries is to raise their cost of production by forcing their standards up, claiming that competition with countries with lower standards is “unfair”. “Free but fair trade” becomes an exercise in insidious protectionism that few recognise as such."
Jagdish Bhagwati,
"Obama and Trade: An Alarm Sounds," Financial Times. January 9, 2009.

In 1970, 17 of 26 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean had authoritarian regimes. Today, only Cuba has a dictatorial regime. Although the transition to market-oriented democracies, which protect individual liberty and property rights under the rule of law, is far from complete in any of the region's countries and will be a long-term process, that transition is already leading to greater political stability and economic prosperity. Economic sanctions have not been responsible for the region-wide shift toward liberalization, however. They have, in fact, failed to bring about democratic regimes anywhere in the hemisphere, and Cuba has been no exception. Indeed, Cuba is the one country in the hemisphere against which the U.S. government has persistently and actively used a full economic embargo as its main policy tool in an attempt to compel a democratic transformation.
The failure of sanctions against Cuba should come as no surprise since sanctions, however politically popular, are notorious for their unintended consequences--harming those they are meant to help. In Cuba, Fidel Castro is the last person to feel the pain caused by the U.S. measures. If sanctions failed to dislodge the military regime in Haiti, the poorest and most vulnerable country in the region, it is difficult to believe that they could be successful in Cuba.
| Trade Policy Analysis |
by Daniel T. Griswold (January 6, 2004) |
| Trade Briefing Papers |
by Mark Groombridge (June 5, 2001) |
| Speeches and Testimony |
(October 12, 2005) |
(July 25, 2002) |
(June 20, 2001) |
(February 15, 2000) |
| Key Points: |
| Books: |
| From the Cato Handbook for Congress: |
|
|
| Commentary |
By Daniel T. Griswold (May 27, 2002) |
by Aaron Lukas (December 14, 2001) |
by Daniel T. Griswold (November 27, 2000) |
by Philip Peters (November 2, 2000) |
by Aaron Lukas (August 24, 1998) |
by Aaron Lukas (February 9, 1998) |
Unions As Safe in Colombia As in D.C.
CEObama
Automakers That Can't Compete Deserve to Disappear
The European Union Stops Banning Ugly Veggies
by Doug Bandow
July 1, 2009
Attention GM Shareholders (That Means You!)
by Daniel Ikenson
June 30, 2009
Charles Rangel Keeps a Cool Head
by Sallie James
June 25, 2009