"[L]abour union lobbies and their political friends have decided that the ideal defence against competition from the poor countries is to raise their cost of production by forcing their standards up, claiming that competition with countries with lower standards is “unfair”. “Free but fair trade” becomes an exercise in insidious protectionism that few recognise as such."
Jagdish Bhagwati,
"Obama and Trade: An Alarm Sounds," Financial Times. January 9, 2009.

In the next 20 years, China could surpass Japan as the world's second largest trading nation, and between 2020 and 2030 the People's Republic of China could emerge as the world's biggest economy. To do so, however, China must continue to liberalize its economy, establish a modern financial system with a sound currency, and conform to international norms for protecting property rights. The United States should help move China in the direction of greater economic and personal freedom by adopting a consistent, long-run policy that normalizes trade relations, integrates China into the global trading order, and promotes exchange on a broad front.
Congress should uphold the principle of free trade and defend human rights; trade sanctions should be used only in extreme cases and only when they have a high chance of success. Too often well-intended sanctions end up harming the parties they were designed to help and delaying real reform.
The U.S. policy of engagement has been sucessful and should be continued and deepened. Congress should not let the bilateral trade deficit with China interfere with that strategy. Any movement away from freer trade and toward protectionism would only delay China's progress toward freedom and prosperity and harm the global economy.
The LATEST from the Center for Trade Policy Studies on China Trade
MORE from the Center for Trade Policy Studies on China Trade![]()
| Trade Policy Analysis |
by Daniel T. Griswold (January 6, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (October 15, 2003) |
by Mark A. Groombridge (April 24, 2000) |
| Trade Briefing Papers |
by Daniel Griswold (July 11, 2006) |
by Daniel Ikenson (March 7, 2005) |
by Dan Griswold, Ned Graham, Robert Kapp, and Nicholas Lardy (July 19, 1999) |
by Robert A. Sirico (July 17, 1998) |
| Speeches and Testimony |
(June 13, 2007) |
(March 26, 2007) |
(February 8, 2007) |
(November 17, 2006) |
(March 6, 2006) |
(November 5, 2005) |
(October 31, 2003) |
(November 6, 2002) |
(June 15, 1999) |
| Free Trade Bulletins |
by Daniel Ikenson (May 7, 2007) |
by Daniel Ikenson (May 31, 2006) |
by Dan Ikenson (June 3, 2004) |
by Gerald P. O'Driscoll Jr. and Lee Hoskins (January 15, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (January 1, 2003) |
| Key Points: |
| Books: |
| From the Cato Handbook for Congress: |
Unions As Safe in Colombia As in D.C.
CEObama
Automakers That Can't Compete Deserve to Disappear
The European Union Stops Banning Ugly Veggies
by Doug Bandow
July 1, 2009
Attention GM Shareholders (That Means You!)
by Daniel Ikenson
June 30, 2009
Charles Rangel Keeps a Cool Head
by Sallie James
June 25, 2009