"The simple fact is that highly skilled foreign-born workers make enormous contributions to our economy [...] The US will find it far more difficult to maintain its competitive edge over the next 50 years if it excludes those who are able and willing to help us compete. Other nations are benefiting from our misguided policies."
Bill Gates,
Testimony before the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives,
March 12, 2008.

The U.S. antidumping law, according to its supporters, ensures "fair trade" by offsetting market distortions caused by foreign governments. Specifically, it allegedly targets "unfair" pricing practices--price discrimination and below-cost sales--that reflect protectionism, cartelization, subsidies, and other structural defects in foreign markets.
Years of analysis has proven that there is a disconnect between the rhetoric of antidumping supporters and the reality of antidumping practice. The law as currently written and enforced does not reliably identify price discrimination or below-cost sales.
Furthermore, the law lacks any mechanism for determining whether the pricing practices it condemns as unfair have any connection to market-distorting policies abroad. Although price discrimination and below-cost sales can result from government interventionism, they can also be due to perfectly normal marketplace behavior. Consequently, the antidumping law frequently punishes foreign firms for unexceptionable business practices routinely engaged in by American companies.
| Trade Policy Analysis |
by Daniel Ikenson (October 6, 2005) |
by Dan Ikenson (October 15, 2003) |
by Brink Lindsey and Dan Ikenson (November 26, 2002) |
by Lewis E. Leibowitz (November 6, 2001) |
by Brink Lindsey and Daniel J. Ikenson (July 30, 2001) |
by Brink Lindsey (August 16, 1999) |
| Trade Briefing Papers |
by Daniel Ikenson (March 7, 2005) |
by Daniel Ikenson (June 22, 2004) |
| Speeches and Testimony |
(October 30, 2001) |
| Free Trade Bulletins |
by Daniel Ikenson (September 14, 2006) |
by Daniel Ikenson (October 28, 2005) |
by Daniel Ikenson (June 20, 2005) |
by Dan Ikenson (June 3, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (April 27, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (January 13, 2004) |
| Commentary |
By Daniel Ikenson (December 9, 2005) |
By Daniel Ikenson (September 9, 2005) |
by Daniel Ikenson (May 19, 2005) |
by Dan Ikenson (September 13, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (February 18, 2004) |
by Daniel Ikenson (December 23, 2002) |
by Brink Lindsey and Dan Ikenson (May 10, 2002) |
by Dan Ikenson (October 22, 2001) |
by Dan Ikenson (August 27, 2001) |
by Dan Ikenson (March 7, 2001) |
by Brink Lindsey (November 12, 1999) |
by Aaron Lukas (May 13, 1999) |
by William A. Niskanen (June 24, 1998) |
By Brink Lindsey (June 1, 1998) |
by Aaron Lukas (April 15, 1998) |
by Brink Lindsey (March 11, 1998) |
by Christopher M. Dumler (October 14, 1997) |
by Christopher M. Dumler (January 1, 1991) |
Immigration law should reflect our dynamic labor market
America will be poorer as Obama pursues the wealthier
When employment lines cross borders
Dems betray our ally Colombia
Is Bob Barr a Libertarian? Certainly Not on Trade
by Daniel Griswold
May 14, 2008
Farm Bill Passed
by Sallie James
May 14, 2008
Hitler's America? Only to an Anti-Trade Liberal
by Daniel Griswold
May 14, 2008
Prevention Is Better than Cure: More on That Veto Override
by Sallie James
May 13, 2008