"[L]abour union lobbies and their political friends have decided that the ideal defence against competition from the poor countries is to raise their cost of production by forcing their standards up, claiming that competition with countries with lower standards is “unfair”. “Free but fair trade” becomes an exercise in insidious protectionism that few recognise as such."
Jagdish Bhagwati,
"Obama and Trade: An Alarm Sounds," Financial Times. January 9, 2009.

Agriculture is one of the most divisive issues in trade today. It is easily the most distorted sector, with high tariffs and, in developed countries at least, large amounts of government subsidies through price supports and direct payments. On the other hand, developing countries, who have a comparative advantage in these products, cannot afford to subsidize their agriculture sector and face prohibitive tariffs for their products abroad. The powerful agriculture lobby groups, particularly in the large developed countries, make reform politically difficult.
This is as true of the United States as it is for that other bogey-man of agricultural trade, the European Union. The U.S. government subsidizes certain farm commodities through direct price supports and tariff rate quotas that limit imports. Americans pay a high price for this ongoing government intervention in agricultural markets: in 2004, U.S. farm programs transferred $16.2 billion from U.S. food consumers to producers.
Congress should seize the opportunity presented by the drafting of a new farm bill in 2007 to fundamentally reshape U.S. agricultural policy in a more market-friendly direction. A farm bill with deep cuts in subsidies and trade barriers would save U.S. taxpayers and consumers tens of billions of dollars during the next decade, would yield environmental benefits by reducing over-production, and stimulate innovation and productivity on farms. Cutting subsidies and trade barriers would also raise incomes of farmers in poorer countries and reduce global poverty, contributing to a more hospitable climate abroad for U.S. foreign policy.
The LATEST from the Center for Trade Policy Studies on Agriculture
MORE from the Center for Trade Policy Studies on Agriculture![]()
| Trade Policy Analysis |
by Sallie James (February 4, 2009) |
by Sallie James and Daniel Griswold (April 16, 2007) |
by Daniel A.Sumner (December 5, 2005) |
by Daniel Griswold, Stephen Slivinski, and Christopher Preble (September 5, 2005) |
by Ronald Bailey (August 1, 2002) |
| Trade Briefing Papers |
by Daniel Griswold (November 16, 2006) |
by Sallie James (November 9, 2006) |
by Daniel Griswold and Daniel Ikenson (September 24, 2004) |
by Brink Lindsey (May 6, 2003) |
by Mark Groombridge (December 4, 2001) |
| Speeches and Testimony |
(June 8, 2004) |
(May 2, 2003) |
(June 6, 2002) |
| Free Trade Bulletins |
by Sallie James (December 7, 2008) |
by Sallie James (January 30, 2008) |
by Thomas Lambie (February 7, 2005) |
by Aaron Lukas (February 9, 2004) |
by Dan Ikenson (January 16, 2004) |
| Commentary |
by Brandon Arnold and Sallie James (May 23, 2008) |
by Sallie James (February 26, 2008) |
by Chris Edwards (July 6, 2007) |
by Chris Edwards (June 28, 2007) |
by Chris Edwards (June 25, 2007) |
by Sallie James (May 21, 2007) |
by Daniel T. Griswold (April 27, 2007) |
By Daniel T. Griswold (September 28, 2006) |
By Sallie James (July 14, 2006) |
by Sallie James (May 19, 2006) |
By Sallie James (April 30, 2006) |
By Daniel Griswold, Stephen Slivinski, and Christopher Preble (February 1, 2006) |
By Daniel T. Griswold (December 15, 2005) |
by Daniel T. Griswold (December 14, 2005) |
By Marian L. Tupy (November 25, 2005) |
By Daniel T. Griswold (November 25, 2005) |
by Daniel Griswold (September 25, 2005) |
by Aaron Lukas (February 12, 2004) |
by Aaron Lukas (February 2, 2004) |
by Brink Lindsey (March 22, 2002) |
by Daniel Griswold (January 7, 2002) |
by Chris Edwards and Tad DeHaven (October 18, 2001) |
by Aaron Lukas (March 26, 2001) |
by Daniel T. Griswold (December 2, 1999) |
by Aaron Lukas (August 2, 1999) |
by Stephen Moore (January 5, 1999) |
by Aaron Lukas (September 10, 1998) |
by Brink Lindsey (March 11, 1998) |
by Aaron Lukas (March 2, 1998) |
Unions As Safe in Colombia As in D.C.
CEObama
Automakers That Can't Compete Deserve to Disappear
The European Union Stops Banning Ugly Veggies
by Doug Bandow
July 1, 2009
Attention GM Shareholders (That Means You!)
by Daniel Ikenson
June 30, 2009
Charles Rangel Keeps a Cool Head
by Sallie James
June 25, 2009